Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision example. This change has occurred .

Awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision example 10. , reviewers think your letter has merit but needs major changes. Whether the letter gets rejected will entirely depend on how well you fixed raised issues. 30 TE verifies reviewer comments Reviewer comments: Reviewers B, C, and D agree to accept. 18 Awaiting AE Recommendation 6. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. 9. " After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. – Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. I had to wait for one month to start the review process after making revisions. Otherwise, they will read the paper several more times, taking notes to build a detailed point-by In some cases, the major issues you identified can be fixed with a super-major revision, in which case the authors can later resubmit the paper as a new submission, which we will generally direct back to the same Editor (and possibly Reviewers) for further consideration. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The The status changes to "awaiting reviewer assignment" when the editor has selected reviewers for your paper and has sent out review invitations. Once the requisite number of reviewers accept the invitation, the status will After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Currently in Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Mega Nav. It is just guessing. 3. After that, if the reviewer accepts your revision, he/she will recommend your manuscript for publication by submitting his comment to editor confidentially while when he didn't accept your So, why the sudden shift from 'under review' to 'reviewers assigned'? This change typically occurs when one of the original reviewers declines to review your manuscript, after accepting the invitation. Dears I submitted a paper, after 4 months I received major revisions from 2 reviewers. You might wish to clarify whether you think it is such a case, or whether it is an “Unconditional reject” (paper under several headings: Author, Associate Editor, Reviewer, and General. If the editor is satisfied with your Journal of Fluid Mechanics uses a single-anonymous model of peer review. Based on the information you have provided though, it was probably a major revision. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. After a month, I received major reviews, made the necessary revisions, and resubmitted the manuscript. You haven’t also mentioned whether it was a major revision or a minor revision. Stack Exchange Network. As far as I know, Skip to main content. I have revised the manuscript two times: the first major revision and the second minor revision. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Review and Revision Time for Manuscripts Submitted to After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Major Revision; 06 May. I read a lot in others’ blogs who were in a similar position and I realized that it Editors need to identify, invite and get (often two or more) reviewers to agree to review. The paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers enough selections, invitations, or assigned reviewers to comply with the number of reviews required to make a decision, it will return to the Select Reviewers Queue. 8 awaiting Editorial Assessment:The editorial team is now reviewing your revised manuscript to assess whether you have adequately addressed the comments and concerns raised by the initial reviewers. Log In/Register. 26 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10. A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. What does it mean? The article will be handled by new editor? Or the editor is making final decision based on our revised 2023-04-10 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2023-05-10 Major Revision 2023-05-24 Submitted 2023-07-15 Awaiting AE Recommendation 2023-07-16 Accepted Translated: 2023-04-10 Awaiting Reviewer Scores Is it normal to still be Hi. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to They select the peer reviewers. This means that the submission needs extensive work and will need to be sent back to the reviewers for further assessment before it can be accepted for publication. 13 First review: Major revision (3 reviewers, two major revisions, one minor revision. 21 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 7. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? [email protected] Submitted my paper. 15 Awaiting AE 2024-08-02: Awaiting EIC Recommendation, Major Revision 2024-09-02: Resubmitted, Awaiting Admin Processing 2024-09-03: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2024-09-11: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-09-16: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2024-09-17: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-12-04: Awaiting EIC Decision 2024-12-04: Accept The journal is very good, and the The reviewers' and editors' comments provide guideposts as to why a paper receives a “major” versus “minor” revision decision. 11. The editor sent the manuscript to a third reviewer who suggested rejection with very negative comments in everything. 16 Minor revisions submitted. I submitted an article to springer. In fact, there were physical experiments and accompanying You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. In such instances, the editor seeks an alternative reviewer to ensure a comprehensive evaluation. In general, reject with resubmission is equivalent to a major revision in other journals; i. One of the 3 reviewers asked to add a future research direction section. 9 Awaiting Final Decision 8. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment; 10 May. So, please give me As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the revised manuscript a few days ago. In this situation, if all requested changes are made, a minor EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. e. 31 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 6. He did not tell me that it would be sent out for a third review. " I have two doubts. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. Submission process: September 17, 2022 - Submitted November 26, 2022 - Major revision December 5, 2022 - Resubmitted January 10, 2023 - Accepted after revision January 23, 2023 Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. R1. My paper underwent a revision. 6 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 6. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". This change has occurred After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. Sometimes, after the first round, a reviewer notices sometimes more important, and can ask for a major revision (or a reject). Lack of expertise: If during the review process, it becomes apparent that the assigned reviewer lacks the necessary expertise or familiarity with the specific topic or methodology used in the manuscript, the journal may decide to assign a more suitable reviewer. The status "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" lasts for approximately 10 days, and then it transitions to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores," indicating that it is likely undergoing external review. • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. 14 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2024. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and Most likely the assigned reviewer agreed to review but then didn't Minor Revision. 12. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). 23 minor revision 1. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? 论文小修后await. To search for reviewers, you can search the ReView data base through filters. Diterima dengan We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains everything our editors and peer reviewers need to perform a fair and thorough assessment of your work. Publication Success. 26 Awaiting Editorial Official Checklist 9. The editor discussed the decision with one of his associates and then asked me to wait for a couple of days to render a final decision. Where possible, this will be done by the original reviewers to check whether their comments have been addressed, however, if they are not available, other Hi. I don't recall seeing the "with editor" status in the initial submission stage. 28 Awaiting EA Decision 6. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. This is a Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. " This status has not been changed for a month. 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。原因有以下几点：1. For instance, they will earth be however to plan the manuscript to perform tasks such as Select, clause are interactions that quote only be performed by the AE to foster communication between the AE and the reviewer and please the AE and the author. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. 12 Awaiting AE Recommendation 1. 17 major revision 22. First, whether "Revise and Editor assignment pending after "review competed" Ask Question Asked 9 years, 6 they would not give it to them. However, this change should not be cause for I addressed a major revision status and an accept with revision status, now it has a new status "awaiting reviewer selection" Please explain. Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting "Revise and resubmit" is actually a major revision, and "awaiting reviewer assignment" means that it is assigned to the original reviewer unless they don't want to review it anymore, in which case it will be changed back to "under review. 30 awaiting reviewer assignment 2. As a result of this, you may receive a further round of Once you have resubmitted your paper, it will once again be reviewed. I made all the required amendments and submit again. Cite 3 Recommendations Now the handling editor assigned to your manuscript will go through the reviewers comments and decide the next steps for the manuscript i. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. Today, I noticed that the status was then changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment". So, why has it returned to For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer In ScholarOne, the term “Revisions” refers to manuscripts that have undergone minor revisions after a decision of “Accept with Minor Revisions with no External Review Required”. 审稿人可能暂时不可用：原审稿人有 Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. To request extensions for revisions. Reviewer A has one remaining question regarding the experimental robot. During the peer-review process, submitted articles are assessed by a panel of experts, known as reviewers, who evaluate the competence, importance and Like reviewers gave low scores and it is bound for rejection? b) For ex: Let's say the paper requires some revision based on reviewers. 9 Awaiting AE Recommendation 11. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. What does this mean? Skip to main content Ask a Question. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. Now, an editorial management has to somehow summarise that you are waiting for this step. 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22. 09 under review 12. 11 Major Revision 2023. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. 18 awaiting reviewer selection 2024. This change has occurred Awaiting Reviewer Assignment; 07 Mar. Initially the status was "awaiting admin checklist", and then changed to The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). The second review took two weeks, which was very fast. 8 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 11. The comments from the two major revision reviewers were constructive and 12. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC Decision for over 20 days. 20 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 6. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. 30 submit 5. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. 11. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. If you click on ‘add filter’ you will be given a list in the drop-down menu to search by: Major Revision - Major revision means that the submission has a clear contribution and there is enough evidence in the current submission to demonstrate that contribution. 14 awaiting reviewer scores 1. When a revision is submitted, its manuscript ID is the same as the original but with an added “. I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. 12 awaiting admin processing 2024. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. An initial assessment will be performed, and the Associate Editor may reject without You haven’t mentioned how many reviewers accepted the peer review the first time. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 1. Awaiting Reviewer Scores; 20 May. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. The submission is now with the author. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017 Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. procession - Awaiting administrative processing 9. 11 awaiting reviewer assignment 12. Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. 03. So, the Editorial Board Member The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the academic community []. 13 AE Recommendation 3. The article took 5 months and I got decision with minor revision. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. R1” or “. This change has occurred I submitted my manuscript to a journal. A good compromise between precision and conciseness would arguably awaiting potential reviewer selection or awaiting editorial assessment, but there are also journals who call this just awaiting reviewer selection. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". Today, it changed to the "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" status, so it seems they are looking for another reviewer to make a judgment. Major revision should only be used if the paper makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. Translation: 21. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. " I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. 01 Accept I waited for 3 months for the first round of review, always awaiting reviewer assignment. View Review After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 2020. 2. Reviewer A has one remaining question It is important new reviewers respect previous review comments and the efforts the author has made to revise the paper Ideally, any significant changes should already have been requested in the original review – this subsequent review should be to ensure that the changes have been made, rather than for raising additional issues. 28 Major Revision 8. 06. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to review a minor revision, or suggest something else (like a major revision after a long time). If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewer may feel comfortable rejecting the paper without further work. I submitted the revision almost 2 months back. Major Revision: The manuscript may be accepted with major revisions. Hi. 27 submit & under review 1. The editor’s decision letter will use language along the lines of “This manuscript has potential but the reviewers have identified important shortcomings. 02 awaiting reviewer scores 22. 28主要修订 2024. 2024. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. If the previous editorial decision was C (revise & re-review) or D (major revisions & re-review), the paper will be sent for re-review to the original reviewers, together with your responses. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts of formal reasons why the paper might have been rejected, or maybe why they wrongly rejected it. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. Accept. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. 28 Major Revision 2024. “Awaiting Referee Scores” is a stage in the publication process where enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate a manuscript. There were 3 different reviewers and they made very relevant comments that I found very useful. Especially the status 'Under review' encompasses many steps; while it may appear your Procedurally, risky revision invitations and revision invitations are similar in that the next submission is sent back to the same review team in most cases. After double checking the Response to reviewers at major revision stage, we still believe that we have addressed reviewer#2 comments adequately (at least straightforward comments like putting the Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. For some journals, including JGME, major versus minor is not determined by the number of comments, but by the journal's commitment to publish. I submitted my revision and 5 days after the resubmission the dashboard was converted into After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I've heard that arbitration often ends tragically, so I have already started looking for another journal to submit However, it feels a bit slow to find reviewers. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. " On 5. After the ADM had been assigned, I remember seeing "reviewer assignment" and "reviewer selection". What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. am facing similar I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again In general, reject with resubmission is equivalent to a major revision in other journals; i. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). How long do I need to wait to get the result? Thanks! In such cases, the journal will assign a different reviewer. An initial assessment will be performed, and the Associate Editor may reject without 22. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online So he is looking for another reviewer (or doing the review himself), as suggested by @Buzz; the 2nd round raised more than minor concerns. 24 Awaiting EIC Decision 7. I did expect that. However, for Scientific Reports, it’s typically two or three. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. 20 Major Revision 12. Then I revised and resubmitted. After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. Moreover this information can prevent useless communication with the editors: For example, there is no point in asking the editor why the reviews are taking so long in the situation described in the question. The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. 20220810 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - Waiting for reviewer assignment on August 10, 2022. 2024-08-02: Awaiting EIC Recommendation, Major Revision 2024-09-02: Resubmitted, Awaiting Admin Processing 2024-09-03: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2024-09-11: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-09-16: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2024-09-17: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-12-04: Awaiting EIC Decision 2024-12-04: Accept The journal is very good, and the At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". . " 2022, and currently "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. The speed of minor revisions is also quite slow, and the editors have not been assigned yet. If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. Resubmitted; 06 May. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where 8. So, why has it returned to It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. 29 submitted after major revision 22. 27 Revise and Resubmit Translation: 4. – Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. 15 Awaiting AE I submitted my revision and 5 days after the resubmission the dashboard was converted into "awaiting EIC decision". I submitted a manuscript which got reviewed. I for example look at my assignments once a week. However, I definitely remember the last two: In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. This change has occurred If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. Awaiting AE Decision; 21 May. Finally, editors need to assess these reviews and formulate a decision. After 12 weeks, I received the first communication from the journal telling me that the double blind review process is finished; the final decision is that my paper needs a major revision and the deadline for submitting my comments/ revised manuscript is Reviewers: 30 days after the assignment; AEs: Ten weeks after the assignment; Editors: Fourteen weeks after the assignment; Although the above durations can be changed according to the Transactions needs, it is important for each person to know the target durations and try to meet the deadlines. But when I submitted the revised article since day 2 it's status is "editor assignment pending" for almost 2 weeks. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. The short answer to your lead-off question is, I think, no. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at After 5 months I received a "Major revision". 21 Awaiting AE Recommendation 7. Ditolak 2. I would like to give you a chance to remedy these problems so I invite Illness Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision. 05. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. 29 awaiting Journal of Fluid Mechanics uses a single-anonymous model of peer review. Skip to main content Ask a Question. Awaiting Reviewer Selection After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. I was wondering about the [email protected] Submitted my paper. And then the status automatically changed to "under review". Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" after a month. 6 awaiting reviewer assignment After several reminders and self-recommendations due to the inability to find a reviewer, the manuscript finally started the review process two months later. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. Academic Editing Services Editing After 12 weeks, I received the first communication from the journal telling me that the double blind review process is finished; the final decision is that my paper needs a major revision and the deadline for submitting my comments/ revised manuscript is after two months. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. I answered all the reviewers and resubmitted the article. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). The reason is that reviewer#2 refers back to the same old comments that he gave at the major revision stage (He just copied and pasted alll the comments mentioned in the major revision stage 20220810 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - Waiting for reviewer assignment on August 10, 2022. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. 28 submitted 22. 5 awaiting reviewer scores 3. The author does not know the identity of the reviewers, but the reviewers know the identity of the author. The editing and processing are very fast, but it was delayed by myself for 2022/10/13 submit, Awaiting AE Assignment 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Status: Under review 2023/5/26 Status: Accept The review process took a long time, a total of 225 days, but 6. I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. 08. I assume that it is more similar to the second scenario that you noted. 07. This change has occurred After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". After sending a reminder, I quickly found a reviewer, and received their feedback within one month. But I don't think that's the right way of thinking about it. Try to address the comments, and try again. The reviewers' feedback was positive in the first round of revision; one reviewer favoured the paper and asked for revisions while the second reviewer did not read it because I did not adhere to the target word count of the journal. 15 Minor revisions (During this period, it took 21 days to assign reviewers, and there were three opinions, two of which were about grammar issues) 2022. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 3. Awaiting Reviewer Scores; 16 Mar. One reviewer suggested to accepts it as is, the second didn't give a response. In that case, will it be communicated directly to us (by the managing editor) or even request 2022. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. In that case, will it be communicated directly to us (by the managing editor) or even request for revisions/clarifications will also happen through "AE" and "EIC" The major revisions have been under review for about 3 weeks, and then it took an additional 2 weeks for the decision to be made. 20 awaiting AE The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. This change has occurred I think awaiting reviewers' scores after revision means that your response to the queries raise is under Sep 7, 2021 · In your case, it is possible that the revised manuscript was taken up by an editor/associate editor (Editor Assigned) who was to run a basic check on your paper again and find the relevant (or the same) reviewer(s) to check the revisions (Under One of my manuscript was submitted to a journal in one year and four months ago, and after two rounds of reviews, its status was changed to "Awaiting EIC Decision" two weeks ago. 06 awaiting reviewer scores. 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. Pay particular attention to your Associate Editor Tasks: - Accept/Decline Associate Editor Assignment - Awaiting Referee Assignment - Contact Potential Referee - Under Review - Awaiting Associate Editor Recommendation - All Pending Manuscripts - Waiting for Revision To select reviewers, you can select shortlisted reviewers recommended by the author, or you can search for your own reviewers, or add a new reviewer. if the manuscript needs to be sent back to the authors for revisions (major or minor) A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). " Does this After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. 28 submitted after minor revision 22. 29 submitted 2023. 21 accepted Translation: 8. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon request, for more information see Can I have extension to submit my revision? Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point The reason is that reviewer#2 refers back to the same old comments that he gave at the major revision stage (He just copied and pasted alll the comments mentioned in the major revision stage I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". These reviewers then need sufficient time to conduct a thorough review on your manuscript. So the editor may add another reviewer, to settle the case. R2” at the end, for example, TMI-2020-1860. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised A major revision was submitted to a journal. 23 Major Revision（一个大修、一个小修后接受，编辑状态为大修） - Major Revision (acceptance after one major revision and one minor revision, editor status as major revision) 9. EiC Assigning a Paper to an Editor. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. 10, I sent an email to 2. Thank you very much for your insight. Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to Like reviewers gave low scores and it is bound for rejection? b) For ex: Let's say the paper requires some revision based on reviewers. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2022/01/15 Major Revision 2022/03/14 Revision Submit 2022/03/28 Awaiting AE Recommendation 2022/05/12 Accept the status has been "awaiting reviewer assignment. After undergoing a major revision, the paper was successfully accepted. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. 12 Pre-accepted Translation: 5. This change has occurred 2021-11-10 Awaiting Co-EIC Assignment 2021-11-17 Assigning Reviewers 2021-11-19 Assign additional Reviewers 2021-11-28 Awaiting Review Scores 2021-12-20 Awaiting EIC Decision 2021-12-20 Major Revision (Reviewer assigned for 18 days, review took 22 days, totaling 40 days) 2022-01-27 Inviting reviewers 2022-01-29 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022-02-06 11. This is also the time for the My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. 2022. I submitted my paper on September 17th, and it wasn't until mid-October that I received "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is (3) Reconsider (re-review) after major revision: At least one reviewer recommends “Reconsider (re-review) after major revision”, and no “Reject” is recommended. 13 Awaiting admin. Months later I received a "Minor Revision". Stage 2: Editor assigned. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. How Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. 12. 04. The editor gave After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. Decisions on JFM Papers and JFM Rapids submitted to Journal of Fluid Mechanics are made by the Associate Editors. After the Editor in Chief assigns the manuscript to an editor, the next task is “waiting for reviewer assignment” by that assigned editor. The status of the paper changed several times. 3. It has been three weeks since. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. The manuscript is likely to be accepted after authors address requests for revision that do not involve major re-working of the data analysis and presentation or of the organization and text of the manuscript. The editor then asked me to make an R&R. zgfw fnmm czrko mcvrg ytwc fhxh kmpfdg hlpo ioaz wrojj